UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. ____ )
Filed by the Registrantþx
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |||
¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |||
x | Definitive Proxy Statement | |||
¨ | Definitive Additional Materials | |||
¨ | Soliciting Material |
SIGMATRON INTERNATIONAL, INC. | ||||
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter) | ||||
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant) | ||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
x | No fee required. | |||
¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |||
¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||
(3) | Filing Party: | |||
(4) | Date Filed: | |||
2201 Landmeier Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007
August 13, 2010
Notice of Annual Stockholders Meeting:
You are hereby notified that the 20102012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of SigmaTron International, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at SigmaTron International, Inc., located at 2201 Landmeier Road, Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007, at 10:00 a.m. local time, on Friday, September 17, 2010,21, 2012, for the following purposes:
1. | To elect | |
2. | To consider a proposal to ratify the selection of BDO USA, LLP as registered public accountants of the Company for the fiscal year ending April 30, | |
3. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. |
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on July 23, 20102012 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meetingand/or adjournments thereof.
You are urged to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to be present in person at the Annual Meeting, please mark, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided.
By Order of the Board of Directors
LindaLINDA K. Frauendorfer
FRAUENDORFER
Secretary
2201 Landmeier Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007
September 17, 2010
This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy are furnished to stockholders of SigmaTron International, Inc. (the “Company”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Company’s Board of Directors for use at the 20102012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (sometimes referred to herein as the “Meeting”) to be held at SigmaTron International, Inc., located at 2201 Landmeier Road, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007, at 10:00 a.m. local time, on Friday, September 17, 2010,21, 2012, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Meeting. This Proxy Statement, the form of proxy included herewith and the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended April 30, 20102012 are being mailed to stockholders on or about August 13, 2010.
Stockholders of record at the close of business on July 23, 20102012 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting. On such date there were outstanding 3,823,0563,930,402 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum. In deciding all questions, each holder of common stock shall be entitled to one vote, in person or by proxy, for each share held on the record date.
If you are a stockholder of record (that is, if you hold your shares in certificate form or if your shares are registered in your name on the books of the Company’s transfer agent, American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as of the close of business on July 23, 2010)2012), and attend the Meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person. However, if you hold your shares in “street name” (not certificate form)registered in your name) (a) you must return your voting instructions to your broker or nominee so that the holder of record can be instructed how to vote those shares or (b) if you wish to attend the Meeting and vote in person, you must obtain and bring to the Meeting a proxy signed by the record holder giving you the right to vote the shares in order to be able to vote at the Meeting. (You maynotuse the voting instruction form provided by your broker or nominee to vote in person at the Meeting.) For directions to the meeting, please contact the Company at847-956-8000.
Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Meeting will be tabulated by the election inspector appointed for the Meeting and will determine whether or not a quorum is present. The election inspector will treat abstentions as shares that are present and entitled to vote but as not voted for purposes of determining the approval of any matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as negative votes on the proposal to ratify the selection of the auditor. If a broker indicates on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on a particular matter (“Broker Non-Votes”), those shares will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to that matter.
Properly executed proxies will be voted in the manner directed by the stockholders. If no direction is indicated, such proxies will be voted FOR the election of each nominee named under the caption “Election of TwoThree Class III Directors” as set forth therein as a directorDirector of the Company, and FOR the ratification of the selection of BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s registered public accountants. If a quorum is present at the Meeting, directorsDirectors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. The ratification of the selection of auditors requiresrequire an affirmative vote by holders of a majority of the shares present at the Meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. Any proxy may be revoked by the stockholder at any time prior to the voting thereof by notice in writing to the Secretary of the Company, either prior to the Meeting (at the above address) or at the Meeting if the stockholder attends in person. A later dated proxy will revoke a prior dated proxy.
All expenses incurred in the solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited on behalf of the Company by directors, officersDirectors, Officers and employeesEmployees of the Company by telephone or telecopy. The Company will reimburse brokers and others holding common stock as nominees
1
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholders Meeting to be held on September 17, 2010.
The proxy statement is available at[http: [http://www.sigmatronintl.com]
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board of Directors knows of no other business which will be presented for consideration at the Meeting. If other proper matters are presented at the Meeting, however, it is the intention of the proxy holders named in the enclosed form of proxy to take such actions as shall be in accordance with their best judgment.
The information contained in this Proxy Statement relating to the occupations and security holdings of directorsDirectors and officersOfficers of the Company and their transactions with the Company is based upon information received from each individual as of July 23, 2010.
2
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of common stock as of July 23, 20102012 by (i) each directorDirector of the Company and each nominee, (ii) each executive officerExecutive Officer of the Company, (iii) each person (including any “group” as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding common stock, and (iv) all directorsDirectors and executive officersExecutive Officers as a group. The address of directorsDirectors and executive officersExecutive Officers isc/o SigmaTron International, Inc., 2201 Landmeier Road, Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007.
Beneficial Ownership
Number of | ||||||||
Name | Shares(1) | Percent | ||||||
Beneficial Owners of at least 5% of the outstanding Capital Stock | ||||||||
Royce & Associates, LLC(2) | 460,243 | 12.0 | % | |||||
1414 Avenue of the Americas | ||||||||
New York, NY 10019 | ||||||||
Cyrus Tang Foundation(3) | 373,884 | 9.8 | % | |||||
8960 Spanish Ridge Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89148 | ||||||||
Fidelity Management & Research Company(4) | 381,880 | 9.99 | % | |||||
82 Devonshire St. | ||||||||
Boston, MA 02109 | ||||||||
Tang Foundation for the Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine(3) | 240,874 | 6.3 | % | |||||
8960 Spanish Ridge Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89148 | ||||||||
Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers | ||||||||
Gary R. Fairhead(5) | 108,203 | 2.8 | % | |||||
Gregory A. Fairhead(5) | 68,307 | 1.8 | % | |||||
John P. Sheehan(5) | 51,566 | 1.3 | % | |||||
Linda K. Frauendorfer(5) | 37,468 | 1.0 | % | |||||
Daniel P. Camp(5) | 49,500 | 1.3 | % | |||||
Rajesh B. Upadhyaya(5) | 22,500 | * | ||||||
John P. Chen(6) | 10,200 | * | ||||||
Thomas W. Rieck(6)(7)(8) | 14,099 | * | ||||||
Carl A. Zemenick(6) | 10,000 | * | ||||||
Dilip S. Vyas(6) | 10,000 | * | ||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group(9) | 381,843 | 9.3 | % |
Name | Number of Shares(1) | Percent | ||||||
Beneficial Owners of at least 5% of the outstanding Capital Stock | ||||||||
Royce & Associates, LLC(2) | 430,940 | 11.0 | % | |||||
1414 Avenue of the Americas | ||||||||
New York, NY 10019 | ||||||||
Fidelity Management & Research Company(3) | 381,880 | 9.8 | % | |||||
82 Devonshire St. | ||||||||
Boston, MA 02109 | ||||||||
Cyrus Tang Foundation(4) | 264,931 | 6.7 | % | |||||
8960 Spanish Ridge Ave. | ||||||||
Las Vegas, NV 89148 | ||||||||
Tang Foundation for the Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine(4) | 131,922 | 3.3 | % | |||||
8960 Spanish Ridge Ave. | ||||||||
Las Vegas, NV 89148 | ||||||||
Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers | ||||||||
Gary R. Fairhead(5) | 123,203 | 3.1 | % | |||||
John P. Sheehan(5) | 35,000 | * | ||||||
Daniel P. Camp(5) | 45,000 | 1.1 | % | |||||
Gregory A. Fairhead(5) | 49,157 | 1.2 | % | |||||
Linda K. Frauendorfer(5) | 37,900 | * | ||||||
Rajesh B. Upadhyaya(5) | 32,500 | * | ||||||
Bruce J. Mantia | 1,500 | * | ||||||
Thomas W. Rieck(6)(7) | 11,200 | * | ||||||
Dilip S. Vyas(6) | 10,000 | * | ||||||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group(8) | 345,460 | 8.3 | % |
* | Less than 1 percent. | |
(1) | Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, the Company believes the persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock reflected in this table. As of July 23, | |
(2) | Number of shares owned by Royce & Associates, LLC, at December 31, |
3
(3) | Number of shares owned by Fidelity Management & Research Company at December 31, 2008, as reported on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2009. Based upon that Schedule 13G/A, FMR LLC, the sole owner of Fidelity Management & Research Company (“Fidelity”), and Edward C. Johnson 3d, the Chairperson of FMR LLC, through their control of Fidelity, each has sole investment power with respect to all of the shares indicated. The Board of Trustees of Fidelity Low Priced Stock Fund, a registered investment company advised by Fidelity, holds sole voting power with respect to all of the shares indicated, which power is carried out by Fidelity pursuant to the Board’s guidelines. |
(4) | The Cyrus Tang Foundation and Tang Foundation for the Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine arenot-for-profit foundations. The entities, whose combined ownership represents approximately | |
(5) | The number of shares includes | |
(6) | Includes 10,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of | |
(7) | ||
In addition to the number of shares set forth on the Beneficial Ownership table, Mr. Rieck is |
(8) | Includes |
SECTION 16 (a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
The Company is required to report to stockholders those directors, officersDirectors, Officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of any class of the Company’s equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), who fail to file timely reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership, as required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Based solely upon a review of copies of such reports furnished to the Company, the Company believes that all persons subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act timely filed all necessary reports during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010.
I. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Pursuant to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of Directors is divided into three classes of directors,Directors, each serving overlapping three-year terms. The term of Class I director Mr.Directors (Ms. Frauendorfer and Messrs. Rieck expiresand Mantia) expire in 2012; the termsterm of Class II directorsDirectors (Messrs. ChenHorek and Zemenick) expirePlante) expires in 2010;2013; and the termsterm of Class III directorsDirectors (Messrs. Gary Fairhead and Vyas) expireexpires in 2011.2014. All directorsDirectors of each class will hold their positions until the annual meeting of stockholders in the year indicated above, at which time the termsterm of the directorsDirectors in such class expire, or until their respective successors are elected and qualified, subject in all cases to any such director’sDirector’s earlier death, resignation or removal.
The Board of Directors did not fillhas determined that each of the vacancy created byDirectors of the retirementCompany, with the exception of Mr. Sove. Accordingly,Gary Fairhead and Ms. Frauendorfer, are independent under the Board of Directors has reducedNasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”), listing standards and the number of directors from six to five asrules of the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
4
If a quorum is present at the Meeting, twothree Class II directorsI Directors will be elected by a plurality of the stockholder votes cast at the Meeting, each to serve until the 20132015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his or her successor shall be elected and qualified, subject to his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes will have no effect on the vote. Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if the authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of each nominee named below. The stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors.Directors. The following persons have been nominated as a Class II director:
Name | Age | ||||||
Linda K. Frauendorfer Class |
5
Name | Age | ||||||
Thomas W. Rieck Class |
Thomas W. Rieck has served as a |
6
Bruce J. Mantia Class I | 65 | Bruce J. Mantia has served as a Director of the Company since August, 2011. Mr. Mantia has been the Chairman of the Compensation Committee since August, 2011. Mr. Mantia joined the accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, in 1973 and served Ernst & Young in various capacities until his retirement in June, 2005. From July, 2005 through October, 2007, Mr. Mantia served as a consultant to Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Mantia provided audit services to mainly publicly held companies. From 1984 through 1988, Mr. Mantia was the lead partner on the Company’s audit team. Subsequent to 1988, Mr. Mantia served in various roles in Ernst & Young’s national office, including as a member of the Operating Committee, as National Director of Total Quality Management, and National Director and Vice-Chair of Human Resources. He served as Office Managing Partner of the Stamford, Connecticut office from February, 1997 to June, 2005. Mr. Mantia was a member of the Chicago 2016 Olympic Committee management team from November, 2006 to July, 2007, serving as its acting Chief Financial Officer during that period. Mr. Mantia is a CPA and holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from the University of Illinois at Chicago. The Board of Directors believes Mr. Mantia’s extensive business and financial background, local and national management experience, and his experience with the auditing of public companies, make him well-qualified to serve as a Director. |
6
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of the nominees named above.
The Board of Directors knows of no reason why the foregoing nominees will be unavailable or will decline to serve, but, in the event of any such unavailability, the proxies received will be voted for such substitute nominees as the Board of Directors may recommend.The enclosed proxy cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than three, the number of nominees named in this proxy statement.
Name | Age | Directors Whose Terms Extend Beyond The Meeting | |||||
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | |||||||
and Other Public Directorships | |||||||
Paul J. Plante Class | Paul J. Plante has served as a Director of the Company since August, 2011. Mr. Plante has been a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees since August, 2011. From December, 2008 to the present, Mr. Plante has been the President and owner of Florida Fresh Vending, LLC., a privately held company, with vending machines throughout central Florida. Mr. Plante began serving in October, 2011 as a member of the Board of Directors of Richardson Electronics Ltd., a publicly traded company. Richardson Electronics provides engineered solutions, power grid and microwave tubes and related consumables and customized display solutions. Mr. Plante served from February, 2007 to May, 2008 as Vice President – Medical Industry Solutions of Kimball Electronics Group Company, an electronic manufacturing services company that serves, among others, the medical industry. From September, 1986 through February, 2007, Mr. Plante served in various capacities for Reptron Electronics, Inc., a publicly traded electronic manufacturing services company located in Tampa, Florida, until its acquisition by Kimball Electronics Group. From September, 1986 to March, 1994, Mr. Plante served as Reptron’s Chief Financial Officer. From March, 1994 through February, 2004, Mr. Plante served as Reptron’s President and Chief Operating Officer and from February, 2004 through February, 2007 served as President and Chief Executive Officer. He holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting from Michigan State University and a Master’s of Business Administration from the University of South Florida. The Board of Directors believes Mr. Plante’s extensive history of management and business experience, particularly in the customized electronics and manufacturing industry, coupled with his financial background, make him well-qualified to serve as a Director. |
7
Name | Age | Directors Whose Terms Extend Beyond The Meeting Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years and Other Public Directorships | ||||
Barry R. Horek Class II | 60 | Barry Horek has served as a Director of the Company since August, 2011. Mr. Horek has been a member of the Audit and Nominating Committees since August, 2011. For over 30 years Mr. Horek was with the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP where he served as a tax partner from 1987 until his retirement in 2007. During that time he served a variety of multinational privately owned and public company clients specializing in manufacturing and consumer products. During his tenure at Ernst & Young LLP, Mr. Horek also served as an area tax business unit leader for the firm’s Entrepreneurial Services Practice and as an Area Director for Tax Policy Implementation where he was responsible for monitoring quality and regulatory compliance. During the 2008-2009 academic year, Mr. Horek taught intermediate accounting at North Central College in Naperville, Illinois and has continued to consult with numerous companies on corporate tax matters. Mr. Horek is a CPA and holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Business Administration from Carthage College and a Master’s of Science in Taxation from DePaul University. Over the past 3 years he has served on the Board of Directors of Loaves and Fishes, a not for profit food pantry of which he is past Treasurer and currently Vice Chairman. He previously served for 10 years as a Board member and President of the Naperville United Way. The Board of Directors believes Mr. Horek’s extensive business and financial background, experience in the manufacturing and consumer products business segment, and his past Board of Director experience, make him well-qualified to serve as a Director. |
8
Name | Age | Directors Whose Terms Extend Beyond The Meeting Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years and Other Public Directorships | ||||
Gary R. Fairhead Class III | 60 | Gary R. Fairhead has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer and a |
9
Name | Age | Directors Whose Terms Extend Beyond The Meeting Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years and Other Public Directorships | ||||
Dilip S. Vyas Class III | 64 | Dilip S. Vyas has served as a |
In July 2011, the Company received the resignation of Carl A. Zemenick from the Board of Directors to be effective on the earlier of September 24, 2011 or the election of a replacement Director. In August 2011, the Company received the resignation of John P. Chen from the Board of Directors to be effective on the earlier of October 7, 2011 or the election of a replacement Director. Messrs. Zemenick and Chen resigned as Directors for personal reasons and not as a result of any disagreement with the Company.
In August 2011, the Board of Directors voted the number of Directors be increased from five to seven, elected Bruce J. Mantia and Linda K. Frauendorfer as Class I Directors and elected Barry R. Horek and Paul J. Plante as Class II Directors in order to fill the vacancies created by such increase and by the resignations detailed above.
10
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors will recommend at the Annual Meeting that the stockholders ratify the appointment of the firm of BDO USA, LLP to audit the accounts of the Company for the current fiscal year. Representatives of that firm are expected to be present at the Meeting, have the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and be available to respond to appropriate questions. BDO USA, LLP was recommended by the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors as the independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year 2011.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of ratification of the selection of BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2011.
In connection with the audits for the years ended April 30, 20102012 and 2009,2011, the Company has had no disagreements with BDO USA, LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of BDO USA, LLP would have caused it to make reference thereto in its report on the consolidated financial statements for 20102012 and 2009.
The ratification of the selection of auditors requires an affirmative vote by holders of a majority of the shares present at the Meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. AbstentionsBroker Non-Votes, while considered present at a meeting and included in the determination of whether a quorum exists, are not considered entitled to vote. Thus, Broker Non-Votes will have no effect. Abstentions will have the same effect as negative votes.
FISCAL YEARS 20102012 AND 20092011 AUDIT FIRM FEE SUMMARY
During fiscal years 20102012 and 2009,2011, the Company retained BDO USA, LLP as its auditor BDO USA, LLP, to provide services as defined below. The following amounts were charged by BDO USA, LLP for services provided in fiscal years 20102012 and 2009.
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Audit Fees(a) | $ | 189,170 | $ | 187,940 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(b) | 9,500 | 10,000 | ||||||
Tax Fees(c)(d) | 18,335 | 53,100 |
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Audit-Related Fees(a) | $ | 197,800 | $ | 195,270 | ||||
Tax Fees(b) | — | 8,000 |
(a) | Fees for audit services billed in |
Audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and reviews of quarterly financial statements.
(b) |
Fees for tax services |
8
Director Committees; Board Meetings
The Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating Committee. The Audit Committee Charter,
11
Compensation Committee Charter and the Nominating Committee Charter are available on the Company’s website atwww.sigmatronintl.com.www.sigmatronintl.com. The Company believes that the composition of these committees meets the criteria for independence under, and the functioning of these committees complies with, the applicable requirements of the current listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations promulgated under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as set forth below.
The functions of the Audit Committee are to: (1) Selectselect and evaluate the performance of the independent accountants. (2) review the audits of the financial statements of the Company and the scope of the audit; (3) review with the independent accountants the corporate accounting and financial reporting practices and policies and recommend to whom reports should be submitted within the Company; (4) review with the independent accountants their final report; (5) review with the internal and independent accountants overall accounting and financial controls; and (6) be available to the independent accountants and management for consultation purposes. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three members: Messrs. Rieck (Chairman), ZemenickHorek and Vyas.Plante. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee both currently and after the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is independent under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission and Nasdaq. Mr. Rieck has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert as defined in Item 407 ofRegulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which was revised and restated as of July 8, 2010.11, 2012, and is available on the Company’s website atwww.sigmatronintl.com. The report of the Audit Committee to the Stockholders is included in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Report of the Audit Committee.”
The functions of the Compensation Committee are to review and recommend to the Board of Directors annual salaries and bonuses for all executive officersExecutive Officers of the Company, to review and recommend to the Board of Directors compensation for the Directors, to review and recommend to the Board of Directors the terms and conditions of all employee benefit plans or changes thereto and to administer the Company’s stock option plans. While the Chief Executive Officer of the Company may make recommendations regarding such salaries, compensation and terms and conditions of employment, the Compensation Committee reviews any such recommendations independently and is responsible for making final recommendations to the full Board of Directors. Messrs. ZemenickMantia (Chairman), Rieck,Plante, and ChenVyas are members of the Compensation Committee. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Compensation Committee is independent under the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
The functions of the Nominating Committee shall includeare to: (1) review and recommend to the Board of Directors the size and composition of the Board of Directors and a slate of nominees for each election of members to the Board of Directors; (2) review and recommend changes to the number, classification and term of directors;Directors; (3) identify and recommend to the Board of Directors candidates to fill appointments to Board committees; (4) develop, assess and make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning appropriate corporate governance policies; (5) identify and recommend to the Board of Directors candidates to fill a vacancy in the offices of President and Chief Executive;Executive Officer; and (6) review nominations by stockholders with regard to the nomination process and to establish the procedures by which stockholder candidates will be considered. The members of the Nominating Committee are Messrs. Vyas (Chairman), ChenHorek and Zemenick.Rieck. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Nominating Committee is independent under the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. listing standards.
The Nominating Committee begins the process of identifying Director candidates by evaluating the current composition of the Board, the Company’s operating requirements, and the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. The Nominating Committee then uses its network of contacts to compile a list of potential candidates, but may also engage, if it deems appropriate, a professional search firm. The Nominating Committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of the Board. In the case of incumbent Directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Nominating Committee reviews such Directors’ overall service during their term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance, and any other relationships and transactions that might impair such Directors’ independence. The Nominating Committee meets to discuss and consider such candidates’ qualifications and then selects a nominee for recommendation to the Board by majority vote. To date, the Nominating Committee has not paid a fee to any third party to assist in the process of identifying or evaluating Director candidates.
12
In evaluating and determing whether to recommend a person as a candidate for election as a Director, the Nominating Committee’s criteria reflects the requirements of the recently adopted Nasdaq rules with respect to
9
The Company does not have a stand-alone diversity policy butwith respect to its Directors. However, in considering whether to recommend any directorDirector nominee, including candidates recommended by stockholders, the Nominating Committee will consider the factors above, including the candidate’s diversity of experiences, expertise, ethnicity, gender and background. The Nominating Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria, and no particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees. The Company believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors,Directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board of Directors to fulfill its responsibilities.
The Nominating Committee will consider proposed nominees whose names are submitted to it by stockholders. The Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal process for that purpose because it believes that the nominatingNominating Committee’s process for considering informationstockholder nominees has been and remains adequate. Historically, stockholders have not proposed any nominees. The Nominating Committee intends to review periodically whether a formal process should be adopted. To be considered,adopted, including whether all stockholder nominations must comply with the notice provisions of the Company’s by-laws, which generally require that such notice be received by the Secretary of the Company not less than 60 days and not more than 90 days prior to a regularly scheduled Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or within 10 days after receipt of notice of an Annual Meeting of Stockholders if the date of such meeting has not been publicly disclosed within 70 days prior to the meeting date.
The Board of Directors held 1020 meetings either in person or by telephone conference during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010.2012. The Compensation Committee held 1 meeting9 meetings in person or by telephone conference and the Audit Committee held 5 meetings in person or by telephone conference during the fiscal year 2010.2012. The Nominating Committee held one meeting3 meetings during the fiscal year 2010.2012. All directorsDirectors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the boardBoard and each of the committees of which they were members. The Company has a policy of encouraging all directorsDirectors to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All directorsDirectors attended the Company’s 20092011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
The Company believes that the non-executiveservice of Gary R. Fairhead as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. Mr. Fairhead possesses detailed and in-depth knowledge of the opportunities and challenges facing the Company, and is thus best positioned to develop agendas that ensure that the Board’s time and attention are focused on the most critical matters. The Board believes his role as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer promotes consistent leadership, engenders accountability, and enhances the Company’s ability to communicate its message and strategy clearly and consistently to its stockholders, employees, and customers. The Company believes the Board’s administration of its risk oversight function to date has had a positive effect on the Board’s leadership structure.
Consistent with the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, because Mr. Fairhead is the Chairman of the Board as well as Chief Executive Officer, the Board has designated one of its members to serve as a Lead Independent Director (“Lead Independent Director”). Dilip S. Vyas was appointed Lead Independent Director by all the Directors in September, 2011, and he continues to serve as Lead Independent Director. Mr. Vyas’ responsibilities include the following roles:
1. | to preside over executive sessions; |
2. | to chair meetings of the Board of Directors in the absence of the Chairman of the Board; |
13
3. | to act as a liaison between the independent Directors and the Chairman of the Board; |
4. | to coordinate with the Chairman of the Board regarding meeting agendas and schedules; |
5. | to coordinate with the Chairman of the Board regarding information flow to the Board; |
6. | to be available for consultation and communication with stockholders, as appropriate; and |
7. | to call meetings of the independent Directors as appropriate. |
The Company believes that it has strong corporate governance processes intended to ensure that its independent Directors will continue to effectively monitor management and provide leadership on key issues such as strategy, risk and integrity. The Board has primary responsibility for the oversight of risks to the Company and has assigned to its committees the oversight of risks applicable to their particular area. Each committee of the Board is comprised solely of independent Directors. Consequently, independent Directors oversee such critical matters as the integrity of financial statements; the compensation of Executive Officers, including the Chief Executive Officer; financial commitments for capital projects; the selection and evaluation of Directors and Gary R. Fairhead isExecutive Officers; and the Presidentdevelopment and CEO. Theimplementation of corporate governance programs. Each Board ofcommittee and the independent Directors believes that separating these roles enables Mr. Fairhead to runas a group routinely have independent sessions without management present.
Management, the Company with minimum distraction while the Chair leadsCompany’s Corporate Counsel, and the Board of Directors discuss risks, both during and advisesoutside of Board meetings. These discussions identify Company risks which are prioritized and assigned to the CEO.
Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors
Stockholders can contact the Board of Directors or any of the individual directorsDirectors by contacting: Henry J. Underwood, Corporate Counsel, Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC, by regular mail at 200 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60604. Inquiries will be reviewed, sorted and summarized by the Corporate Counsel of the Board of Directors before they will be forwarded to the Board of Directors or to an individual director.
Compensation of Directors
The Company pays non-employee directors $2,500Directors $4,500 per month. Directors who serve onThe Chairman of the Audit Committeeand Compensation Committees are paid an additional $1,500$500 and $250 per month. Directors who serve on the Compensation Committee or the Nominating Committee are paidmonth, respectively. The Lead Independent Director receives an additional $250 per month per committee. The Chairman of the Board receives monthly the greater of $4,000 or the amount paid to the most highly compensated non-employee director. The directors voluntarily reduced the above compensation scale by 20 percent beginning February 2009 due to the Company’s cost reduction program in response to the downturn in the economy. Due to the improvement in the Company’s financial
10
14
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Set forth below is information on the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its two other most highly compensated Named Executive Officers who served in such capacities during fiscal year 20102012 based on total compensation for the last completed fiscal year. In view
On November 10, 2011, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of SigmaTron International, Inc. (the “Company”), adopted (a) the SigmaTron International, Inc. 2012 Employee Bonus Plan (the “Employee Plan”), and (b) the SigmaTron International, Inc. 2012 Officer Bonus Plan (the “Officer Plan” and, collectively with the Employee Plan, the “Plans”). The stated purposes of the depressed economic environmentPlans are to align stockholder, employee and officer objectives, to motivate Employees and Officers of the Company’s reduced profitability during late 2008Company and muchto increase shareholder value. Each of calendar year 2009, the Named Executive Officers (together withPlans will be administered and interpreted by the Board. Each Plan, as a whole, is also subject to amendment, suspension or termination by the Board.
The Employee Plan:
The Employee Plan applies to all the other officers andU.S. payroll non-union U.S. employees of the Company) participatedCompany (“Employee Participants”), all full-time employees of the Company with a corporate position of vice president or higher (“Officers”) and all employees designated by the Company as an executive officer pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (“Executive Officers”).
Pursuant to the Employee Plan, a Bonus Pool shall be created under the Employee Plan which shall be calculated as a percentage of Pre-Tax Income (as defined in salary reductions which took effectthe Employee Plan) pursuant to the scale set forth in the Employee Plan. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer will submit to the Company’s Compensation Committee a recommendation (i) of target objectives for each Executive Officer and (ii) for a specified percentage or dollar allocation of the Bonus Pool for each Executive Officer and Officer, individually, and all of the Employee Participants, in the aggregate. The Compensation Committee reviewed such submissions for recommendation to the Board. Awards to Executive Officers under the Employee Plan were based, in part, on February 1, 2009,the Executive Officer achieving the Executive Officer’s specified target objectives and, no bonuses were awarded during fiscal year 2009. In lightin any event, was subject to the sole discretion of the Board. Awards to Employee Participants under the Employee Plan was contingent upon the Company being in compliance with all of the Company’s improved financial performance duringcovenants under its primary credit facility (currently with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.), or having obtained a waiver thereof, at the end of the Company’s 2012 fiscal year 2010,year.
The 2012 Officer Plan:
The 2012 Officer Plan applied to all non-union U.S.full-time employees receivedof the Company with a partial repaymentcorporate position of those salary reductionsvice president or higher (“Participants”), and established the Named Executive Officers receivedterms and conditions upon which the Company intended to pay cash bonuses in the aggregate repayments of $47,267. Salaries oftotaling $170,000 to eligible Participants for the Company’s 2012 fiscal year. Bonuses under the 2012 Officer Plan were to be paid only if (1) the Company’s Pre-Tax Income for the 2012 fiscal year equaled or exceeded $340,000; and (2) the Company was in compliance with all non-union employees, including Named Executive Officers, remainedcovenants under the Company’s primary credit facility at the reduced levels throughoutend of the 2012 fiscal year 2010. or a waiver was obtained; and (3) the Company achieved the Operational objectives approved by the Board of Directors. All conditions were satisfied and the $170,000 Bonus Pool was distributed among the eligible Participants by the Committee, which first reviewed a proposal submitted to it by the Chief Executive Officer, who was responsible for making a Bonus Pool allocation recommendation to the Board.
At the end of fiscal year 2010,2012, the Company awarded bonuses pursuant to all of its non-union U.S. employees.the Plan discussed above. Bonuses earned in fiscal year 20102012 and paid to Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 20112013 are listed in the following summary compensation table.
15
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The individuals listed in the following table are referred to as our “Named Executive Officers” throughout this proxy statement. The following table sets forth a summary of all compensation paid by the Company for its fiscal years ended April 30, 20102012 and 20092011 to the Company’s Named Executive Officers:
Annual Compensation | All Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Salary | Bonus | Compensation | Compensation | |||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | ($) | ($) | (2)($) | ($) | ||||||||||||||||
Gary R. Fairhead | 2010 | 150,000 | 45,000 | (1) | 19,993 | 214,993 | ||||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | 2009 | 188,349 | 0 | 2,184 | 190,533 | |||||||||||||||
Rajesh B. Upadhyaya | 2010 | 156,000 | 40,000 | (1) | 17,700 | 213,700 | ||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President, West Coast | 2009 | 182,450 | 0 | 2,522 | 164,972 | |||||||||||||||
Operations since 2005. Mr. Upadhyaya was the Vice President of the Fremont Operation from 2001 until 2005. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gregory A. Fairhead | 2010 | 153,600 | 40,000 | (1) | 15,375 | 208,975 | ||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and Assistant | 2009 | 183,899 | 0 | 2,139 | 186,038 | |||||||||||||||
Secretary. Gregory A. Fairhead has been Executive Vice President since February 2000 and Assistant Secretary since 1994. Mr. Fairhead was Vice President — Acuna Operations for the Company from February 1990 to February 2000. Gregory A. Fairhead is the brother of Gary R. Fairhead |
Annual Compensation | All Other Compensation ($) | Total Compensation ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
Gary R. Fairhead | 2012 | 239,423 | (1) | 50,000 | (2) | 2,500 | (4) | 291,923 | ||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | 2011 | 192,307 | (1) | 70,000 | (3) | 2,785 | (4) | 265,092 | ||||||||||||
Rajesh B. Upadhyaya | 2012 | 208,404 | 40,000 | (2) | 2,500 | (4) | 250,904 | |||||||||||||
Executive Vice President, West Coast Operations since 2005. Mr. Upadhyaya was the Vice President of the Fremont Operation from 2001 until 2005. | 2011 | 189,000 | 45,000 | (3) | 2,680 | (4) | 236,680 | |||||||||||||
Gregory A. Fairhead | 2012 | 196,542 | 30,000 | (2) | 2,500 | (4) | 229,042 | |||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and Assistant Secretary. Gregory A. Fairhead has been Executive Vice President since February 2000 and Assistant Secretary since 1994. Mr. Fairhead was Vice President — Acuna Operations for the Company from February 1990 to February 2000. Gregory A. Fairhead is the brother of Gary R. Fairhead | 2011 | 186,092 | 35,000 | (3) | 3,589 | (4) | 224,681 |
(1) | Although Gary R. Fairhead served as a Director in fiscal year 2012 and 2011, he did not receive any compensation for serving in such capacity as it is Company policy to compensate as Directors only non-employee Directors. |
(2) | Represents bonus earned in fiscal |
(3) | Represents |
(4) | Represents match and contributions to the Company’s 401(k) plan made by the Company. |
11
The Company adopted an Amended and RestatedChange-in-Control Severance Payment Plan on May 30, 2002 (the “CIC Plan”), which covers Named Executive Officers and certain other officersOfficers of the Company (each a “CIC Participant”). Under the terms of the CIC Plan, each CIC Participant is entitled to the payment of severance pay in the event such CIC Participant’s employment with the Company is involuntarily terminated within twenty-four months of a change of control of the Company. The amount of severance pay to which a CIC Participant may be entitled under the CIC Plan is a function of the value of the common stock of the Company as of the date on which a change in control of the Company takes place.
In general, for purposes of the CIC Plan, a change of control will be deemed to have occurred when (a) any entity, person or group other than Cyrus Tang or his affiliates, acquires more than thirty percent of the outstanding stock entitled to vote for directorsDirectors of the Company, (b) as a result of or in connection with certain corporate transactions identified in the CIC Plan, the identity of a majority of the members of the Board of Directors immediately before such transaction changes immediately after the transaction, (c) the merger, consolidation, or share exchange of the Company, or (d) a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. In general, a CIC Participant’s employment will be deemed to have been involuntarily terminated under the CIC Plan in the event of such employee’s termination by the Company for a reason other than (w) for cause (as defined in the Plan), (x) death, (y) disability, or (z) that employee’s voluntary retirement or resignation except on account of the reasons set forth in the CIC Plan (which in general would result in a constructive discharge).
16
The CIC Plan provides for automatic reduction of the amounts to be paid out under the plan in the event such amounts would constitute “parachute payments” under the Internal Revenue Code. Payments under the CIC Plan are also subject to an aggregate cap equal to 15% of the market value of the Company’s outstanding capital stock on such date in the event the employment of one or more of the CIC Participants is terminated voluntarily or involuntarily within seven days after thechange-in-control. Disputes concerning the CIC Plan and benefits under the CIC Plan are subject to arbitration.
Potential Severance Payments uponChange-In-Control
The following table describes approximate potential severance payments under the CIC Plan to which the Named Executive Officers would be entitled uponchange-in-control of the Company, assuming that the change in control of the Company occurred on April 30, 2010,2012, that all participants actually participated in the severance payment, and that our common stock is valued at $6.13,$3.77, which was the closing market price for our common stock on April 30, 2010.2012. The actual amount of payments can only be determined at the time of achange-in-control and will vary from the estimated amounts in the table below.
Gary R. | Rajesh B. | Gregory A. | ||||||||||
Fairhead | Upadhyaya | Fairhead | ||||||||||
Change-In-Control Payment | $ | 412,714 | $ | 398,182 | $ | 371,810 |
Gary R. Fairhead | Rajesh B. Upadhyaya | Gregory A. Fairhead | ||||||||||
Change-In-Control Payment | $ | 227,122 | $ | 226,126 | $ | 231,617 |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to each Named Executive Officer of the Company concerning any unexercised options held as of the end of such fiscal year. The Company has not granted any stock appreciation rights. No options were exercised or granted in fiscal year 2010.
Number of | Number of | |||||||||||||||
Securities | Securities | |||||||||||||||
Underlying | Underlying | |||||||||||||||
Unexercised | Unexercised | Option | ||||||||||||||
Options | Options | Exercise | Option | |||||||||||||
(#) | (#) | Price | Expiration | |||||||||||||
Name | Exercisable | Unexercisable | ($) | Date | ||||||||||||
Gary R. Fairhead | 30,000 | 0 | 9.17 | 9/15/15 | ||||||||||||
Rajesh B. Upadhyaya | 22,500 | 0 | 9.17 | 9/15/15 | ||||||||||||
Gregory A. Fairhead | 29,150 | 0 | 2.20 | 2/12/12 | ||||||||||||
27,500 | 0 | 9.17 | 9/15/15 |
12
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | ||||||||||||
Exercisable | Unexercisable | |||||||||||||||
Gary R. Fairhead | 30,000 | (1) | 0 | 9.17 | 9/15/15 | |||||||||||
Rajesh B. Upadhyaya | 22,500 | (1) | 0 | 9.17 | 9/15/15 | |||||||||||
Gregory A. Fairhead | 27,500 | (1) | 0 | 9.17 | 9/15/15 |
(1) | Stock options granted on September 16, 2005 vested and became 100% exercisable on September 15, 2007. |
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN
The Company has established a tax-qualified defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan for U.S. employees, which includes Officers. The Plan provides for Company matching of employee contributions up to $300 per employee per year and the Company has historically made a plan contribution of 1% of an employee’s compensation.
17
Fees | ||||||||
Earned or | ||||||||
Paid in | ||||||||
Cash | Total | |||||||
Name | ($) | ($) | ||||||
Thomas W. Rieck | 45,000 | 45,000 | ||||||
Dilip S. Vyas | 42,500 | 42,500 | ||||||
John P. Chen | 38,400 | 38,400 | ||||||
Carl A. Zemenick | 38,400 | 38,400 |
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Total ($) | ||||||
Barry R. Horek | 37,663 | 37,663 | ||||||
Bruce J. Mantia | 37,073 | 37,073 | ||||||
Paul J. Plante | 37,663 | 37,663 | ||||||
Thomas W. Rieck | 57,750 | 57,750 | ||||||
Dilip S. Vyas | 53,250 | 53,250 | ||||||
John P. Chen(1) | 22,500 | 22,500 | ||||||
Carl A. Zemenick(1) | 22,500 | 22,500 |
It is the Company’s policy to compensate only non-employee Directors.
(1) | Messrs. Chen and Zemenick resigned from the Board of Directors in fiscal 2011 for personal reasons and not as a result of any disagreement with the Company. |
The Company did not issue stock grants or stock option grants to the Board of Directors during fiscal year 2010.2012. No options were exercised in fiscal year 2010.
13DIRECTOR OUTSTANDING STOCK OPTIONS
Name | Number of Options Outstanding | |||
Dilip S. Vyas | 10,000 | |||
Thomas W. Rieck | 10,000 | |||
William L. McClelland | 10,000 | |||
Franklin D. Sove | 10,000 | |||
John P. Chen | 10,000 | |||
Carl A. Zemenick | 10,000 |
18
The Audit Committee has reviewed, and discussed the audited financial statements with management, and discussed with the independent public accountantsaccounting firm (the “Auditors”) the matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under the rules adopted by Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU § 380), as the same has been modified or supplemented.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent public accountantsAuditors required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, as the same has been modified or supplemented,PCAOB regarding the Auditor’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed the Auditor’s independence with the independent public accountants the independent public accountants’ independence.Auditors. Based on the review and discussions referred to herein, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the last fiscal year for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This report is submitted by the members of the Committee.
Thomas W. Rieck (Chairman)Dilip S. VyasCarl A. Zemenick
14Barry R. Horek
Paul J. Plante
19
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
There are no reportable related party transactions.
20
MISCELLANEOUS
The Company’s 20102012 Annual Report to Stockholders is being mailed to stockholders contemporaneously with this Proxy Statement.
Proposals of Stockholders
In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any proposal of a stockholder intended to be presented at the Company’s 20112013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Secretary of the Company before April 19, 201118, 2013, in order for the proposal to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s notice of meeting, proxy statement and proxy relating to the 20112013 Annual Meeting.
Stockholders may present proposals that are proper subjects for consideration at an annual meeting, even if the proposal is not submitted by the deadline for inclusion in the proxy statement. The stockholder must comply with the procedures specified by the Company’s by-laws which require all stockholders who intend to make proposals at an annual stockholders meeting to send a proper notice which is received by the Secretary not less than 120 or more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the Company’s consent solicitation or proxy statement released to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s election of directorsDirectors or meeting of stockholders; provided that if no Annual Meeting of Stockholders or election by consent was held in the previous year, or if the date of the annual meeting has been changed from the previous year’s meeting, a proposal must be received by the Secretary within 10 days after the Company has publicly disclosed the date of such meeting.
The Company currently anticipates the 20112013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held September 16, 2011.
The by-laws also provide that nominations for directorDirector may only be made by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or by a stockholder entitled to vote who sends a proper notice which is received by the Secretary noof the Company not less than 60 ordays and not more than 90 days prior to the meeting. However,regularly scheduled Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or within 10 days after receipt of notice of an Annual Meeting of Stockholders if the Company has not publicly disclosed the date of thesuch meeting at leasthas not been publicly disclosed within 70 days prior to the meeting date, notice may be timely made by a stockholder if received by the Secretary no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which the Company publicly disclosed the meeting date.
Some brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” corporate communications to stockholders, such as proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of this proxy statement may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household. The Company will promptly deliver a separate copy of this proxy statement to you if you call or write us at the following address or phone number: SigmaTron International, Inc., 2201 Landmeier Road, Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007, Telephone:(800) 700-9095. If you want to receive separate copies of our corporate communications to stockholders such as proxy statements and annual reports in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you should contact your broker or other nominee record holders, or you may contact the Company at the above address and phone number.
By order of the Board of Directors
Linda K. Frauendorfer
Secretary
Dated: August 13, 2010
15
21
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
SIGMATRON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL:
The Notice of Meeting, proxy statement and proxy card
are available at www.sigmatronintl.com
Please sign, date and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.
i | Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope | i |
n | 20333000000000000000 6 | 092112 | ||||||||||||||||||
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x | ||||||||||||||||||||
FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | ||||||||||||||||||
1. Election of | 2. PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE SELECTION OF BDO USA, LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | ||||||||||||||||
¨ ¨ ¨ | FOR ALL NOMINEES WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR ALL EXCEPT (See instructions below) | NOMINEES: O O O Bruce J. Mantia | 3. IN THEIR DISCRETION, ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY | ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | ||||||||||||||
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR, | ||||||||||||||||||||
Receipt is hereby acknowledged of the Notice of the Meeting and Proxy Statement dated August 24, 2012 as well as a copy of the 2012 Annual Report to Stockholders. | ||||||||||||||||||||
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. | ||||||||||||||||||||
INSTRUCTIONS:To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark | ||||||||||||||||||||
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. | ¨ |
Signature of Stockholder | Date: | Signature of Stockholder | Date: |
n | Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. | n | ||||||||||||||||
| n | |||||||
SIGMATRON INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2201 LANDMEIER ROAD ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL 60007 | ||||||||
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS | ||||||||
The undersigned hereby appoints Gary R. Fairhead, Linda K. Frauendorfer and Henry J. Underwood, and each of them, with full power of substitution, as attorneys and proxies to represent the undersigned at the | ||||||||
(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side) | ||||||||
n | 14475 | n |